To: (Separate email addresses with commas)
From: (Your email address)
Message: (Optional)
Send
Cancel
Thanks!
Close
Study up before you accept these instrument approaches...
LDA approaches utilize a localizer that's simply offset from a runway centerline, often due to terrain.
A PAR approach is similar to an ILS. Both vertical and lateral navigation guidance is provided to the pilot, all without the use of navigation-reliant cockpit instrumentation. Air Traffic Controllers use radar to track the aircraft's position, then tell pilots over the radio what corrections they should make. These approaches are most commonly found at military bases around the country.
The only equipment required for an ASR approach is a functioning radio. The controller vectors the aircraft to align it with the runway centerline, and continues to do so until the aircraft can make a landing visually. It's flown in a similar fashion to many non-precision approaches, where step-down altitudes are used along the final approach path.
Most localizer equipment is coupled with glideslope equipment, as a part of an ILS approach. Aspen, Colorado (KASE), is one example of an airport that has a LOC-only approach (LOC DME-E).
As NDBs are decommissioned, their use during instrument approach procedures is becoming more and more uncommon. However, states like Alaska still have a lot of them.
Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) approaches provide highly accurate GPS signals. These systems couple ground-based GPS receiver stations located around an airport with space-based GPS signals. In the USA, GBAS approaches are available at a limited number of airports including Newark (EWR) and Houston (IAH).
Have you flown one of these approaches? Tell us in the comments below.
Whether you're starting your instrument training or brushing up for your next flight, this course gives you the knowledge, confidence, and flexibility to be a great instrument pilot.